The usual statement is that the complexity in a sensory modality reflects regularities of the environment, but I wish to offer a slightly different viewpoint. To illustrate this view, I must borrow and severely simplify the punchline of a truly elegant paper, "The Perceptual Organization of Colors" by Roger Shepard [Shepard92]. Among other questions, this paper seeks to answer the question of trichromancy: Why are there three kinds of cones in the human retina, and not two, or four? Why is human visual perception organized into a three-dimensional color space? Historically, it was often theorized that trichromancy represented an arbitrary compromise between chromatic resolution and spatial resolution; that is, between the number of colors perceived and the grain size of visual resolution. As it turns out, there is a more fundamental reason why three color channels are needed.
To clarify the question, consider that surfaces possess a potentially infinite number of spectral reflectance distributions. We will focus on spectral reflectance distributions, rather than spectral power distributions, because adaptively relevant objects that emit their own light are environmentally rare. Hence the physically constant property of most objects is the spectral reflectance distribution, which combines with the spectral power distribution of light impinging on the object to give rise to the spectral power distribution received by the human eye. The spectral reflectance distribution is defined over the wavelengths from 400nm to 700nm (the visible range), and since wavelength is a continuum, the spectral reflectance distribution can theoretically require an unlimited number of quantities to specify. Hence, it is not possible to exactly constrain a spectral reflectance distribution using only three quantities, which is the amount of information transduced by human cones.
The human eye is not capable of discriminating among all physically possible reflecting surfaces. However, it is possible that for "natural" surfaces - surfaces of the kind commonly encountered in the ancestral environment - reflectance for each pure frequency does not vary independently of reflectance for all other frequencies. For example, there might exist some set of basis reflectance functions, such that the reflectance distributions of almost all natural surfaces could be expressed as a weighted sum of the basis vectors. If so, one possible explanation for the trichromancy of human vision would be that three color channels are just enough to perform adequate discrimination in a "natural" color space of limited dimensionality.
The ability to discriminate between all natural surfaces would be the design recommended by the "environmental regularity" philosophy of sensory modalities. The dimensionality of the internal model would mirror the dimensionality of the environment.
As it turns out, natural surfaces have spectral reflectance distributions that vary along roughly five to seven dimensions [Maloney86]. There thus exist natural surfaces that, although appearing to trichromatic viewers as "the same color", nonetheless possess different spectral reflectance distributions.
[Shepard92] instead asks how many color channels are needed to ensure that the color we perceive is the same color each time the surface is viewed under different lighting conditions. The amount of ambient light can also potentially vary along an unlimited number of dimensions, and the actual light reaching the eye is the product of the spectral power distribution and the spectral reflectance distribution. A reddish object in bluish light may reflect the same number of photons of each wavelength as a bluish object in reddish light. Similarly, a white object in reddish light may reflect mostly red photons, while the same white object in bluish light may reflect mostly blue photons. And yet the human visual system manages to maintain the property of color constancy; the same object will appear to be the same color under different lighting conditions.
[Judd64] measured 622 spectral power distributions for natural lighting, under 622 widely varying natural conditions of weather and times of day, and found that variations in natural lighting reduce to three degrees of freedom. Furthermore, these three degrees of freedom bear a close correspondence to the three dimensions of color opponency that were proposed for the human visual system based on experimental examination [Hurvich57]. The three degrees of freedom are:
* The light-dark variation, which depends on the total light reaching the object.
* The yellow-blue variation, which depends on whether a surface is illuminated by direct sunlight or is in shade. In shade the surface is illuminated by the Raleigh-scattered blue light of the sky, but is not directly illuminated by the sun. The corresponding yellow extreme occurs when an object is illuminated only by direct sunlight; e.g., if sunlight enters through a small channel and skylight is cut off.
* The red-green variation, which depends on both the elevation of the sun (how much atmosphere the sun travels through), and the amount of atmospheric water vapor. E.g., illumination by a red sunset versus illumination at midday. Red wavelengths are the wavelengths least scattered by dust and most absorbed by water.
The three color channels of the human visual system are precisely the number of channels needed in order to maintain color constancy under natural lighting conditions20. Three color channels are not enough to discriminate between all natural surface reflectances, but three color channels are the exact number required to compensate for ambient natural lighting and thereby ensure that the same surface is perceptually the "same color" on any two occasions. This simplifies the adaptively important task of recognizing a previously experienced object on future encounters.
Võistlusväljaku tingimustes on võibolla teised muutumissuunad värvidel, aga idee on sama.
<p>The last thing we needed was another bout of you denied it but you were caught on tape histrionics, <a href="http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com">replica louis vuitton handbags</a>. Deja vu seems to be one of the traits of Irish politics, and what we get is largely to be expected, <a href="http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com">louis vuitton replica</a>.</p>
<p>louis vuitton replica business as usual. Enda Kenny did indeed break an election party promise (and a personal one, no matter how he puts it), and <a href="http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com">replica lv bags</a>, as a result, rather than having a meaningful debate on whether or not these replica lv bags should be closed, we have a bout of handbags over who said what.</p>
<p>We also had the louis vuitton bags showing of hypocrisy that has recently enveloped Fianna Fail. Has anyone spotted that Micheal Martin has been breaking his own post-election promise of constructive opposition? Maybe someone should dig up the audio tape on that one <a href="http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com">louis vuitton bags</a>, because for the past three months he has provided replica louis vuitton handbags.</p>